Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 19:45:53 -0500 From: dmaddox@scsn.net (Donald J. Maddox) To: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> Cc: dmaddox@scsn.net, jak@cetlink.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 16650 Support(?) Message-ID: <19980111194553.03029@scsn.net> In-Reply-To: <199801120039.TAA00461@dyson.iquest.net>; from John S. Dyson on Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 07:39:07PM -0500 References: <19980111193227.04735@scsn.net> <199801120039.TAA00461@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 07:39:07PM -0500, John S. Dyson wrote: > Charlie Root said: > > On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 07:07:35PM -0500, John S. Dyson wrote: > > > John Kelly said: > > > > On Sun, 11 Jan 1998 15:06:19 -0500, dmaddox@scsn.net (Donald J. > > > > Maddox) wrote: > > > > > > > > > I recently bought a 16C650-based LavaPort ISA card to support the > > > > >230,400 bps capability of my ISDN modem. It works fine under W95, but > > > > >does _not_ work fine under FBSD-current. > > > > > > > > The 650 support seems to be broken, so don't flag it as a 650. Run it > > > > as a 550 and it should work fine. You still get the benefit of the > > > > deeper FIFO, even when it's defined as a 550. You don't get the auto > > > > CTS/RTS flow control, but that has questionable value anyway. > > > > > > > I have a 16650 based card, and it appears to work well. It would be interesting > > > to figure out why mine works, and others don't. > > > > What kind of card do you have? I assume it's not a LavaPort... > > > SIIG CyberPro I/O. It has a full complement of IRQ and I/O port jumpers, > and also a baud rate scaling jumper set, which allows running at *2 and *4 > baud rates. Figures. I came _that close_ >< to buying the CyberPro... This card does not have jumpers for the clock... seems to be fixed at 4x. I think maybe that's the source of my problem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980111194553.03029>