Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 16 Dec 2019 05:06:28 -0500
From:      Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why does poudriere insist on rebuilding the same packages over and over
Message-ID:  <20191216050628.000029f4@seibercom.net>
In-Reply-To: <7e08dca3-d576-66ce-1e1c-6fc92df27963@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20191215075741.5df439b4@scorpio> <2f765131-c56f-f963-2f28-22d71e857ab8@FreeBSD.org> <20191215142518.000002c9@seibercom.net> <7e08dca3-d576-66ce-1e1c-6fc92df27963@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 07:13:07 +0000, Matthew Seaman commented:
>On 15/12/2019 19:25, Jerry wrote:
>> I created a script file to handle the formating of the poudriere
>> command line. Regarding # 2, I found I did have a "-c" in the line.
>> I am not sure why I put it there. I removed it. Would a "-C" make any
>> difference? In any case, I will try it out the next time the ports
>> tree is updated or I need to install a new file.  
>
>You probably don't want '-C' either -- this forces poudriere to rebuild
>all of the ports named on the command line or in its input file.
>Normally you'ld just have a list of ports that you want in your
>repository and let poudriere work out whether any of them need to be
>rebuilt.
>
>	Cheers,
>
>	Matthew

Thank you, Matthew.

-- 
Jerry



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20191216050628.000029f4>