Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:50:27 -0800
From:      hiren panchasara <hiren@strugglingcoder.info>
To:        Sreekanth Rupavatharam <rupavath@juniper.net>
Cc:        "jfv@freebsd.org" <jfv@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Double cleanup in igb_attach
Message-ID:  <20150127195027.GB63990@strugglingcoder.info>
In-Reply-To: <D0ED284D.1A867%rupavath@juniper.net>
References:  <D0EC151C.1A7B1%rupavath@juniper.net> <20150127192814.GA63990@strugglingcoder.info> <D0ED284D.1A867%rupavath@juniper.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--NMuMz9nt05w80d4+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 07:36:17PM +0000, Sreekanth Rupavatharam wrote:
> >
> >Seems reasonable to me at the first glance.
> >
> >We need to call IGB_CORE_LOCK_DESTROY(adapter) before returning though.
> >
> Not necessary. igb_detach does that.

Bah, I read that call inside detach as UNLOCK. Yeah, you are right.=20

cheers,
Hiren

--NMuMz9nt05w80d4+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)
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=
=065L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NMuMz9nt05w80d4+--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150127195027.GB63990>