Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 14:49:00 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: grog@lemis.de Cc: rminnich@Sarnoff.COM, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: larry: you might want to add this to lmbench (but i'm not sure) Message-ID: <199511112149.OAA08162@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199511110902.KAA19222@allegro.lemis.de> from "Greg Lehey" at Nov 11, 95 10:02:43 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Forgive me if I'm not critical :-) I just tried it out on two > 486DX/2-66s, one running BSD/386 1.1 and the other running FreeBSD > 951004 SNAP. I think the numbers (for 100000 iterations) speak for > themselves. > > BSD/386: 10.19 real 0.33 user 9.61 sys > FreeBSD: 54.25 real 0.82 user 52.67 sys > > People may argue that this is a silly benchmark, but I still think we > should be interested to know why FreeBSD takes over 5 times as long to > run this program. We know why. Both John Dyson and myself clearly identified the contributing factors. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511112149.OAA08162>