Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:25:00 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, stable@freebsd.org, John E Hein <jhein@timing.com>, jhb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: locked vnode / nfs... requires kill -9 in ddb Message-ID: <200610210825.00228.davidxu@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20061019100442.GN55428@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <17718.20457.799395.602805@gromit.timing.com> <20061019100442.GN55428@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 19 October 2006 18:04, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > The nfs_reply is sleeping with the PCATCH set. The question is why SIGTSTP > does not cause msleep to return with EINTR. I have not been tracking the thread. but if the thread is sleeping with PCATCH, the SIGTSTP should cause the process to stop unless the signal is masked by sigprocmask or the signal has an action handler been set, this is a correct behavior. David Xu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200610210825.00228.davidxu>