Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:35:15 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Pietro Cerutti <gahr@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>, Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r346114 - head/devel/p4.el Message-ID: <20140310143515.GB92282@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140310141659.GG11135@gahrfit.gahr.ch> References: <201402260657.s1Q6vEsH059562@svn.freebsd.org> <BEE32AF42CDC7ED09B7234F0@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20140226123420.f5c0d0ff40b404a70334da4b@FreeBSD.org> <20140310072423.GC11693@FreeBSD.org> <f8e85ff21f349babc099b00d8207a8b2@apnoea.adamw.org> <3D82157DD87FC9C0C7724278@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20140310141659.GG11135@gahrfit.gahr.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 03:16:59PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > ports-policy-change-announce@ comes to mind :) Has anybody else ever felt > the desire to get notified whenever a policy is updated? Just to avoid > having to skim through commit logs. It's getting a bit ridiculuos, no? Guys, nothing was discussed thus far which does not come naturally from common sense. Certainly there are few special cases that require deeper analysis (e.g. proper, legally-clean LICENSE handling), but from what I see, most of "please don't/do this-or-that" stuff comes from negligence rather than deliberate dissent from PHB or common practices. If every committer would review *entire* Makefile before 'svn ci', there would be presumably less messages on the lists. :) ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140310143515.GB92282>