Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:00:05 +0100 From: Koop Mast <kwm@rainbow-runner.nl> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, Michal Varga <varga@stonehenge.sk>, multimedia@freebsd.org, mkbosmans@gmail.com Subject: Re: pulseaudio: module.c: module-detect is deprecated: Please use module-udev-detect instead of module-detect! Message-ID: <1299081605.45274.32.camel@crashalot.rainbow-runner.nl> In-Reply-To: <4D6E6758.3050704@freebsd.org> References: <4D6E558B.5090706@freebsd.org> <1299078805.52738.15.camel@xenon> <1299079125.52738.16.camel@xenon> <4D6E6758.3050704@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 17:50 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 02/03/2011 17:18 Michal Varga said the following: > > On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 16:13 +0100, Michal Varga wrote: > >> So instead of fixing things like these in ports, I'd say the issue > >> should be reported/fix submitted to upstream, it's pretty much possible > >> that they don't even know that there are systems that don't run evdev > >> (note that I don't mean it offensively, more like speaking generally > >> from experience, it simply happens). > >> > > > > Eh, I meant udev of course, I guess that's enough coffee for me today. > > That's possible, of course. Another possibility is that they think that > everything is Linux, or everything is like Linux, or they don't care about not Linux. > > I am all for contacting them, for sure. > Just want to point out that the proposed patch would not be against the nature of > the ports, because it doesn't affect functionality, but addresses OS differences. > I was planning on submitted some of our pulse patchs upstream. I will also submit this one as part of that. -Koop
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1299081605.45274.32.camel>