Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Apr 1995 01:25:06 +0100 (BST)
From:      Paul Richards <paul@isl.cf.ac.uk>
To:        julian@ref.tfs.com (Julian Elischer)
Cc:        FreeBSD-hackers@FreeBSD.org, questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Proposed gateways.
Message-ID:  <199504260025.BAA13779@isl.cf.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <199504260016.RAA09230@ref.tfs.com> from "Julian Elischer" at Apr 25, 95 05:16:06 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to Julian Elischer who said
> 
......

> I would rather see  a one way gate of questions..
> two way will send followups to questions as well.
> I don't think we need this..
> what we DO want is the ANSWERS to go to the usenet group as well however,
> 
> 
> 'question by mail' ---------->mojordomo------------>list with reply to:
>                                 |                 set to user and 'answers'
>                                 |
>                                 |----------------> Usenet 
>                                                    Reply-to:
>                                                    set to user and 'answers'
>                                                    "REPLY BE EMAIL" added.
> 
> 'answer by mail' ---------->mojordomo------------>list
>                                 |
>                                 |----------------> Usenet 

Umm, if you reply to an usenet message and it gets sent to majordomo it's
going to end up back on usenet anyway isn't it? I don't quite follow what
you're getting at here.

The reply-to field in the usenet posting would point to questions@freebsd.org
so the list would see the reply and it would go back to usenet as well.
This is effectively a two way gate and what I advocated. The follow-up
field has to point to question too otherwise replies from the usenet side
won't be seen back on questions.

> > We need a higher profile on usenet, questions will basically be sacrificed
> > for this purpose, If people feel that questions becomes too much for them
> > then it's up to them whether they stick with it. In fact, discussion has
> > suggested that many people have already made this decision and unsubscribed
> > so those of us left probably don't mind the load :-)
> questions will become the same as usenet.. this is not good
> questions should have questions...
> answers on 'answers'

Umm, what exactly are you on about? Two lists, one for answers? seems pretty
silly to me.


-- 
  Paul Richards, FreeBSD core team member. 
  Internet: paul@FreeBSD.org,  URL: http://isl.cf.ac.uk/~paul/
  Phone: +44 1222 874000 x6646 (work), +44 1222 457651 (home)
  Dept. Mechanical Engineering, University of Wales, College Cardiff.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504260025.BAA13779>