Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:46:30 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Milan Obuch <net@dino.sk>, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Subject: Re: Julian's netowrking challenge 2005 Message-ID: <20050629064630.GA48704@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <42C199C0.1040704@elischer.org> References: <42C0DB3B.6000606@elischer.org> <20050628074640.GY1283@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <200506281139.17582.net@dino.sk> <200506281147.13299.max@love2party.net> <20050628102728.GZ1283@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <42C199C0.1040704@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Having the possibility to tag a packet would be worth indeed. But I > >think that Milan wants to bring network stack virtualization in > >newer release of FreeBSD IIUC. This would be, IMO, a great improvement > >of FreeBSD networking, although I'm pretty sure this would make Netgraph > >people react a bit ;-). > > why? > I think they are orthogonal. I was just kidding, because new features sometimes trigger a netgraph praise saying it is already possible with this framework. But this worthless. -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050629064630.GA48704>