Date: Fri, 09 May 1997 21:00:40 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Cc: Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net>, Timothy Moore <moore@WOLFENET.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: g++ shared library segfaults Message-ID: <17949.863236840@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 09 May 1997 18:56:44 PDT." <199705100156.SAA11098@rah.star-gate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Qt looks pretty good to me replace it by something better and I will > consider it. I thought we were talking about document prep systems - now we're evaluating GUI toolkits on their own, independant merit? I'm confused. :-) If we're doing the latter then one could certainly far worse than use Qt. Pity about the C++ part though. :-) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17949.863236840>