Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:24:35 -0400 From: "Jerry B. Altzman" <jbaltz@gmail.com> To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Negative Review of FreeBSD 5.4 Message-ID: <2b677bda05060210244f01165d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <429EF96E.16172.33600ABA@localhost> References: <20050602091600.Q20286@Osgiliath.home.lan> <429EF96E.16172.33600ABA@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/2/05, Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> wrote: > On 2 Jun 2005 at 9:17, Neal E. Westfall wrote: > > Anybody have any thoughts on this review? > > http://os.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=3D05/05/24/2153257&tid=3D8 > I suggest you provide your thoughts first. OK, I think a lot of the points he brings up are valid ones. (I have not yet tried to get FBSD 5.4 up yet, I've been tied up with other things.) I think his offhand comment on the Giant Lock shows some lack of depth; it is a major undertaking, and really fundamentally (IMHO) important. I think the comment about "low-end and desktop" was ... well, something of a gratuitous swipe... > Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ //jbaltz --=20 jerry b. altzman jbaltz@gmail.com foo mane padme hum
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2b677bda05060210244f01165d>