Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 Sep 2005 23:12:53 +0200
From:      Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: comms/ltmdm and COMPAT_43
Message-ID:  <20050911211253.GA77354@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
In-Reply-To: <1348.1126427547@phk.freebsd.dk>
References:  <20050911080408.GA46725@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <1348.1126427547@phk.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 10:32:27AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20050911080408.GA46725@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>, Divacky Roman writes:
> 
> >> Most of our tty stuff depends on COMPAT_43
> >
> >what of the tty stuff depends on COMPAT_43? I found some ioctls and then
> >nothing.. 
> 
> It is only the ioctls, but there are several hundred ports which break
> if we don't support then.
> 
> On my todo list, the tty parts of COMPAT_43 becomes standard (for that
> reason) and the rest of COMPAT_43 can then become optional.

if I make those patches will you take a look at it (I am tired of making
patches noone cares about)?

I already freed linuxator out of COMPAT_43 so if tty is free as well we can get
rid of COMPAT_43 in generic - with some nice benefits (speed up etc.)

roman



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050911211253.GA77354>