Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Mar 1998 22:29:10 -0600 (CST)
From:      Kevin Day <toasty@home.dragondata.com>
To:        karl@mcs.net (Karl Denninger)
Cc:        dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, shimon@simon-shapiro.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG, jak@cetlink.net, karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se
Subject:   Re: Donations.
Message-ID:  <199803060429.WAA22909@home.dragondata.com>
In-Reply-To: <19980305215754.02721@mcs.net> from Karl Denninger at "Mar 5, 98 09:57:54 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I don't know if there has been any recent breakage.... does anyone else have
> any serious (ie: heavy-duty) experience in this area that can speak to
> whether the -CURRENT tree, as it exists now, is ok in the NFS server area?

I've played with it a bit.

nfsd under 2.2.5 is stable as a rock.

nfsd under -current croaks under heavy load.

Trying to backup my -current server over nfs to a slow tape drive can kill
it, easily. Usually it's the 'console is still responsive, but all processes
are hung.' situation.


Kevin

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803060429.WAA22909>