Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 14:49:52 -0600 From: David Syphers <dsyphers@uchicago.edu> To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BOOT2_UFS=UFS1_ONLY works for today's current Message-ID: <200302231449.52766.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <20030223180716.V32647@mail.unixguru.nl> References: <20030223025528.GD88377@gothmog.gr> <200302230237.33848.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> <20030223180716.V32647@mail.unixguru.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 23 February 2003 11:10 am, Richard Arends wrote: > On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, David Syphers wrote: > > I added BOOT2_UFS=UFS2_ONLY to my make.conf, and my buildworld still dies > > in boot2. I'm trying to upgrade from a Feb. 19 -current (because it's > > crashing all the time, and I need to enable debugging stuff). Is there a > > fix, or would other information be helpful? > > Same problem over here. I reverted back the last commit on > /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h in my source tree and that "fixed" the build. Of > course, this is a workaround !! Okay, I've verified that the problem is due to rev. 1.39 of /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h. Peter Wemm pointed out that the problem is not the commit, but gcc's bad handling of 64-bit operations. Nonetheless, this commit does break world for a lot of people... is there some official solution? The make.conf line only works for UFS1 - if it's set to UFS2, buildworld still fails. (Am I correct in assuming a 5.0-R install defaults to UFS2?) -David -- http://www.seektruth.org Astronomy and Astrophysics Center The University of Chicago To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302231449.52766.dsyphers>