Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 11:28:15 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> To: sobomax@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <200203281628.g2SGSFp0016178@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <1017310574.580.20.camel@notebook>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 Mar, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > The whole affair (the problem spotted by knu and this one) showed that > bento testing, is important, but should not be used as a substitute > for ordinary peer review and testing, because bento's bsd.port.mk > usage pattern is quite poor. Unfortunately, I suspect that even > though my patch was available for more that two weeks but only few > individuals actually gave it a try. That's the real problem, which > needs to be addressed somehow. That's fine, actually. Only what you commit gets tested -- and fixed. Seems like a normal worflow to me -- as long as the fixing part comes promptly. -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203281628.g2SGSFp0016178>