Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:34:12 -0600 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player Message-ID: <20091004053412.GC37100@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: <19143.19392.666064.939130@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <28f938b10910021725p7e615617xf21639d3fb7fcc9d@mail.gmail.com> <4AC6E7A5.6090002@lazlarlyricon.com> <19143.19392.666064.939130@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Md/poaVZ8hnGTzuv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 09:04:00AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: > Rolf G Nielsen writes: >=20 > > > Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. > > =20 > > Where do I vote to have them continue forever not creating a > > FreeBSD version of that crap? >=20 > Is your objection to Flash in particular, or to any product in > that specific niche? I don't know about the other guy, but I find the Adobe Flash Player plugin pretty odious. Unfortunately, I also find Swfdec and Gnash pretty substandard as well. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --Md/poaVZ8hnGTzuv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkrIM9QACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKX4lQCfcqLiln0IxdKH2Y2t6y96IF9h mGwAnipAR5PxqpATdRiozhbkiHMNy0bL =j+TQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Md/poaVZ8hnGTzuv--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091004053412.GC37100>