Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 16:21:19 -0800 From: Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> To: Anthony Green <green@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Behlendorf <brian@hyperreal.org>, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [press@apache.org: PRESS RELEASE: ASF Reaches Agreement with Sun to Allow Open Source Java Implementations] Message-ID: <20020330002119.GA1537@gnuppy.monkey.org> In-Reply-To: <1017419202.5814.1933.camel@dhcppc2> References: <20020328002610.GA2023@gnuppy.monkey.org> <20020327221634.M1335-100000@yez.hyperreal.org> <20020328064218.GA2973@gnuppy.monkey.org> <1017330145.2206.84.camel@dhcppc2> <20020329004939.GA1639@gnuppy.monkey.org> <1017419202.5814.1933.camel@dhcppc2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 09:59:10AM -0800, Anthony Green wrote: > I don't know off the top of my head. If you ask on java@gcc.gnu.org I'm > sure you'll get plenty of good answers. Last time I looked, I didn't think that the Boehm GC was terribly modern and support either generational or incremental collection.: > > Is it JNI compatible BTW ? > > Yes. We also have a unique, and much faster native code interface > called CNI if you can afford to lose portability. At what price ? The JNI layer is heavy weight for a reason. And that's to provide direct access directly invoke methods so that stuff like RMI, etc... can happen in terms of the JVM itself so that it's transparent to runtime typing system. What about class reflection ? bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020330002119.GA1537>