Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 12:55:14 -0700 From: "Peter S. Housel" <housel@acm.org> To: <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Linuxulator: emulation? [was: Q: Extending the sysctl MIB...] Message-ID: <00cc01bee821$42d9fe20$55f9989d@nb.conexant.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908161231220.604-100000@eccles.salk.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom Bartol <bartol@salk.edu> wrote: > In a previous e-mail on this or a related thread I saw the term: > > "Linux image activator" > > or something close to this pass by. I think this term gave me a much > closer feeling to what I imagine is really going on the the "linuxulator" > than the term "emulator" and all its baggage. So we could name it the > "Linux image activator" or "Lin-Axe" or some such... How about "Linux Compatibility ABI"? It's accurate, it gives the right impression, and it has an impressive ring to it. Cheers, -Peter- housel@acm.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00cc01bee821$42d9fe20$55f9989d>