Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Apr 1997 09:53:26 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        dennis@etinc.com (dennis)
Cc:        danny@panda.hilink.com.au, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Probing deflugalty
Message-ID:  <199704181653.JAA02174@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970417185259.00b2cdf0@etinc.com> from "dennis" at Apr 17, 97 06:53:01 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Putting the 'device dev0' in makes sure the code is included, but 
> >numbering starts after the ISA numbers.
> 
> Uh....PCIs are probed first, so how would the above work...it makes
> much more sense for the PCI boards to be first (ie ed0, ed1) and
> the isa cards last, since you can specify the isa cards device name,
> but the PCI device name is dependent on whats in the system.

You attach what you can't move, then what is hard to move, then what
can be moved automagically, then what can be moved, but doesn't
have to be, because it's capable of sharing resource.

The issue is not probe order, it's attach order.


					Regards,
					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704181653.JAA02174>