Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:33:58 -0700 From: Ultima <ultima@ultimasbox.com> To: Mel Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? Message-ID: <CANJ8om6WmNQWibnSCMR2hf09he-wWBUnBmY5Mnn7%2BNtvUHhcBQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> References: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Mel, While it may be possible to have an IPv6 only environment, I don't think it is really viable. There are simply too many things that don't run on or have very limited support for IPv6 that it makes it very hard to drop IPv4 altogether and until something comes along forcing the move it likely won't happen for at least another decade at the minimum. Best regards, Richard Gallamore On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 6:50 PM Mel Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> wrote: > I'm looking to set up a pure-IPv6 environment to test the viability of > it. I tried this a few years ago and fell flat on my face due to the > lack of NAT64 and DNS64 support. > > Reading through docs now, it looks like unbound has a DNS64 module, and > NAT64 is baked into ipfw. Waving a hand at bug-hunting and lamentations > over the inertia of embedded systems designers, has it really become > this easy to turn up an IPv6-only site? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANJ8om6WmNQWibnSCMR2hf09he-wWBUnBmY5Mnn7%2BNtvUHhcBQ>