Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 10:31:09 +0100 From: Igor Mozolevsky <igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk> To: David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Core Team Response to Controversial Social Media Posts Message-ID: <CADWvR2hpNcHw7HvQ=sT4Og8rFpKjm1sZKatTgVwT-Fu0zdd=3g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5D2765D5-BBC6-4D27-83F4-A9A8B2B4F4C5@FreeBSD.org> References: <868svf6r05.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> <CADWvR2hekmiTeUxoJ=AOstgbWbVpjs6YYzx6syVN9kVcR3bfHw@mail.gmail.com> <CADWvR2i9jic44r4CbmA=rTn-Ej=9Ex439gUO7syZfj_6jmygzg@mail.gmail.com> <e5586cc9-672e-414e-9d63-2c3df50b6abd@www.fastmail.com> <CADWvR2hx%2BYbf5GxpwhjzeX_9Zkk0h_Gc2ftC7nypyuNAJP14=A@mail.gmail.com> <ed052186-1de9-1a7a-1c18-e3b57fdeb96c@gmail.com> <CANCZdfo6HrPdKeWHgZt5-2agb8deXETjmf7HNYO7Rf3ZnDWRZA@mail.gmail.com> <CADWvR2h9DWY05X2FSgFYVKcBR3EVhient9QmEjrVB00U9eWstw@mail.gmail.com> <CANCZdfqyjK6WHHOY0Jd7ThYaMKTVELNftMADwfgWdQaf0KcDBg@mail.gmail.com> <CADWvR2i5XG5_AmaAW1wHWafFpSG5oY6O3BqeTn1=7FYdhQ%2BV-w@mail.gmail.com> <5D2765D5-BBC6-4D27-83F4-A9A8B2B4F4C5@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 09:20, David Chisnall wrote: > > On 19 May 2019, at 20:43, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: > > > > the best > > explanation of democracy I have ever heard was: "two wolves and a > > sheep deciding what to have for dinner!" > > If you believe that this quote in any way supports your argument, then I = would suggest that you work through the game theoretic implications of this= structure. > > (Hint: if the sheep can abstain, the sheep is never eaten and even withou= t abstention the sheep isn=E2=80=99t going to be eaten today) Wow, what an art of arbitrary context switching! If anything, you demonstrate utter failure of understanding how the herd-rule^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hdemocracy works: "majority wins;" for some contrived reason you seem to think that *everyone* needs to have voted... On top of that, if you want people to hear you, quit making opaque assertions, and muster some brain cells to set out an argument... Regardless, you, too, are attempting to (rather badly) reframe the original problem and divert discussion, and the original problem was whether or not CoC should restrict freedom of expression. Do you have anything to say on *this* topic? --=20 Igor M.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADWvR2hpNcHw7HvQ=sT4Og8rFpKjm1sZKatTgVwT-Fu0zdd=3g>