Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:12:33 +0100 From: Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org> To: FreeBSD-mobile@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PowerNow in mobile AthlonXP Message-ID: <20040318151233.GT28592@poupinou.org> In-Reply-To: <20040317221529.GD53072@www.lambertfam.org> References: <74EC3F3BA88A824FA61D3FD88097DB821915EF@ITIServer03.iti> <20040311180557.GB78217@www.lambertfam.org> <20040313000147.GQ28592@poupinou.org> <1079517975.10165.0.camel@localhost> <20040317192650.GB41487@www.lambertfam.org> <20040317202916.GA5235@trimind.de> <20040317211359.GB53072@www.lambertfam.org> <20040317220838.GA5647@trimind.de> <20040317221529.GD53072@www.lambertfam.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 05:15:29PM -0500, Scott Lambert wrote:
> In retrieve_conf_from_bios(), try changing :
> for (i = 0; i < psb->numpst; i++) {
> to:
> for (i = 0; i < psb->numpst * 2 ; i++) {
>
> On my laptop the matching entry is at i = 16 even though
> psb->numpst = 14.
>
After looking more your report, I have a theory: I think that
originaly the OEM do have designed the board in order to ship an
AthlonXP-M model 8. After that, they used an AthlonXP-M model 10
instead, but "forgot" to update the Performance State Block in order to
get the correct number of Performance State Tables that the BIOS
contains.
I will see how to handle that.
Thank,
--
Bruno Ducrot
-- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?
-- Don't know. Don't care.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040318151233.GT28592>