Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 21:52:52 +0200 From: <driesm.michiels@gmail.com> To: "'Hiroki Sato'" <hrs@allbsd.org> Cc: <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: DHCPv6 client in base Message-ID: <00aa01d50b57$c84ac020$58e04060$@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20190516.044252.1672818225777964175.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <001e01d50b49$176104d0$46230e70$@gmail.com> <20190516.032012.517661495892269813.hrs@allbsd.org> <006001d50b53$72a22e00$57e68a00$@gmail.com> <20190516.044252.1672818225777964175.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@allbsd.org>
> Sent: woensdag 15 mei 2019 21:43
> To: driesm.michiels@gmail.com
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: DHCPv6 client in base
>=20
> <driesm.michiels@gmail.com> wrote
> in <006001d50b53$72a22e00$57e68a00$@gmail.com>:
>=20
> dr> > I have a plan to import wide-dhcp6 into the base system because
> dr> > it is simple enough.
> dr>
> dr> Thats nice! Any timeline for this; 13.0 RELEASE?
>=20
> Yes, at the latest. I originally planned it before 12.0 but not =
happened for
> some non-technical reasons.
>=20
> dr> > More specifics about the complex configuration?
> dr>
> dr> My initial wording wasn't correct; wide-dhcp is in fact featureful
> although buggy when config files get a bit bigger.
> dr> Well I'm trying to assign a 64 prefix to two virtual interfaces =
and one
> physical from a 56 delegation.
> dr> For this config it errors out on parsing the config file ... while =
I'm 99%
> certain there is not a problem in it.
> dr>
> dr> interface em0 {
> dr> send rapid-commit;
> dr> send ia-na 1;
> dr> send ia-pd 1;
> dr> };
> dr>
> dr> id-assoc na 1 { };
> dr>
> dr> id-assoc pd 1 {
> dr> prefix ::/56 infinity;
> dr> prefix-interface igb0 {
> dr> sla-id 0;
> dr> sla-len 8;
> dr> };
> dr> prefix-interface lo1 {
> dr> sla-id 1;
> dr> sla-len 8;
> dr> };
> dr> prefix-interface tun0 {
> dr> sla-id 2;
> dr> sla-len 8;
> dr> };
> dr> };
> dr>
> dr> May 15 21:20:50 May 15 21:20:50 vados dhcp6c[94383]: failed to =
parse
> dr> configuration file
>=20
> In this configuration dhcp6c does not work because lo1 has no L2 =
address
> to generate an interface ID which will be used with the /64 prefix. =
Is there
> any specific reason why you want to use a loopback interface?
I was planning to use the prefix on lo1 as the ext_if argument in an =
IPFW NPTv6 rule.
That would translate my private jail addresses to their corresponding =
global ones from the prefix.
I know its possible with VIMAGE to just run rtadvd on a bridge but I =
rather stay away from that, one rule in IPFW is all I need.
>=20
> -- Hiroki
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00aa01d50b57$c84ac020$58e04060$>