Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 09 Mar 2018 15:31:29 -0700
From:      Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
To:        Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org>, David Bright <dab@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r328013 - head/sbin/fsck_ffs
Message-ID:  <1520634689.84937.74.camel@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180309220940.GG6174@raichu>
References:  <201801151925.w0FJPCKA019434@repo.freebsd.org> <20180309220940.GG6174@raichu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 17:09 -0500, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 07:25:11PM +0000, David Bright wrote:
> > 
> > Author: dab
> > Date: Mon Jan 15 19:25:11 2018
> > New Revision: 328013
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/328013
> > 
> > Log:
> >   Exit fsck_ffs with non-zero status when file system is not repaired.
> >   
> > [...]
> etc/rc.d/fsck doesn't know how to interpret the new exit code and now
> just drops to a single-user shell when it is encountered. This is
> happening to me semi-regularly when my test systems crash, especially
> when I test kernel panic handling. :)
> 
> Is there any reason etc/rc.d/fsck shouldn't automatically retry (up to
> some configurable number of retries) when the new error code is seen?
> The patch below seems to do the trick for me:
> 

fsck_ffs already has a -R flag to automatically retry, wouldn't that be
a better mechanism for handling this new type of retry?

-- Ian




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1520634689.84937.74.camel>