Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:03:43 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@freebsd.org> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strip FreeBSD a bit Message-ID: <xzp7k4g26lc.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20030910104807.GB47986@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> (Andreas Klemm's message of "Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:48:07 %2B0200") References: <3F50C956.70603@carebears.mine.nu> <20030830151544.G21642@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <3F5193E2.8060805@carebears.mine.nu> <20030831065010.GA23179@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> <20030909221106.GA31532@dds.nl> <20030910104807.GB47986@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andreas Klemm <andreas@freebsd.org> writes: > 2 or 3 years I installed a RedHat for testing ... well the > basic installation didn't contain even "sed". I very much doubt that, as sed(1) is required by POSIX. > I even dislike that UUCP had to go into ports ... Now you don't > have a standard tool in standard OS install like cu to connect > to serial ports what need for job in the networking area. When UUCP was removed, tip(1) was hacked to understand cu(1)'s command-line syntax, so we still have cu(1). I use it every day. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp7k4g26lc.fsf>