Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 05:15:51 -0500 (EST) From: Adam <bsdx@looksharp.net> To: "Alexey N. Dokuchaev" <danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru> Cc: Alwyn Schoeman <alwyns@littlecruncher.prizm.dhs.org>, Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@nojunk.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FFS vs ext2fs (Was: Re: Not enough information) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001060514270.17839-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001061554530.26779-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexey made no statement about performance, so don't turn this into an issue it isn't. On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Alexey N. Dokuchaev wrote: >> Recently FreeBSD's not so great filesystem got corrupted. Guess what got >>damaged? Package information, so now I can't get any information on >>installed packages.UPgrading ports, I mean installed ports? Probably the >>only point its got going > >Bullsh*t! FFS totally outperforms ext2fs, and I've never heard any >opposite statements. > >./danfe > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0001060514270.17839-100000>