Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      19 Mar 2002 00:54:05 +0100
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org, fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: panic: bwrite: buffer is not busy???
Message-ID:  <xzpy9gpjuua.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <20020318154041.B71020@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <20020317124958.A34008@xor.obsecurity.org> <xzpadt6r1xr.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020318061739.GB894@elvis.mu.org> <xzpvgbupdqa.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020318071623.GD894@elvis.mu.org> <20020318010245.A48956@xor.obsecurity.org> <xzp4rjep7m5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020318143204.GA688@elvis.mu.org> <xzplmcpn8un.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020318223631.GA23014@elvis.mu.org> <20020318154041.B71020@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:
> The panic in tail was triggered by using -f (i.e. kqueue),

Like I said, that panic was irrelevant since it was a consequence of
an incorrect patch.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpy9gpjuua.fsf>