Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Jun 2003 01:13:46 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To:        Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: vr(4) duplex problems
Message-ID:  <20030617011055.O8740@odysseus.silby.com>
In-Reply-To: <200306171038.23826.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
References:  <200306161909.33474.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>    <200306171038.23826.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Daniel O'Connor wrote:

> > If possible, I'd like you to try some other brands of 100/FDX hubs and see
> > if autonegotiation works properly; this would help tell us if the problem
> > is general, or specific to that card.
>
> I don't have any other brands of 100/FDX switches :(
> I will try and dig one up, but I think the best I can do is a different
> generation switch from the same manufacturer.

Well, then we're somewhat stuck.

Couldn't you sneak in a little 5 port hub from home and splice it into the
network? :)

> ukphy0: <Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface> on miibus1
> ukphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto

Nothing out of the ordinary there, but perhaps we're messing up by _not_
recognizing a specific PHY and doing something special.  Hmmmm...

I have an idea, but since forced duplex works for you, I'm not inclined to
spend time on it now.

Mike "Silby" Silbersack



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030617011055.O8740>