Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:29:31 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: wine-freebsd@hub.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net>, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_thr.c syscalls.master src/sys/sys Message-ID: <20070820192931.GK87451@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <1639123F05401A4F2A1C3F33@ganymede.hub.org> References: <200708182118.37998.tijl@ulyssis.org> <20070818204223.D1234@fledge.watson.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708182050070.13363@sea.ntplx.net> <46C7A9A4.5090404@samsco.org> <20070819095302.D66918@fledge.watson.org> <222044094-1187603330-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1638751523-@bxe027.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <46C9AE64.50705@samsco.org> <20070820182905.GH87451@elvis.mu.org> <46C9E2A7.8030202@samsco.org> <1639123F05401A4F2A1C3F33@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> [070820 11:59] wrote: > > Just for the record here, I think that Scott did bring up a very valid point in > what he had said ... Kris did mention 'PC-BSD including it even if FreeBSD > didn't' (or words to that effect), and Scott's response was only meant (at > least the way I had read it) to bring us back into focus that we are better to > come up with a BSD solution vs risking further forking of code ... > > Please note that in all of this dicussion, it is only been recent that someone > mentioned a 'kld solution', which I think would be cool ... > > I do think that the 'mud slinging' at Scott was quite out of place ... There was no mud being slung, threatening someone with a fork because they choose to go with a kld until the developers can accept a new call (that exists in just about every other OS)... whatever dude. I suggested the kld by the way. -Alfred
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070820192931.GK87451>