Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 31 Oct 2017 12:09:43 +0000
From:      Ben Laurie <ben@links.org>
To:        Eric McCorkle <eric@metricspace.net>
Cc:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Benjamin Kaduk <bjk@freebsd.org>,  "freebsd-security@freebsd.org security" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>,  "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>,  "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Crypto overhaul
Message-ID:  <CAG5KPzzkSz93dO9F0vuKtvVQdZgfTTsnh1dzX4iqCkEHmxXjTQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <cfa28da2-0a4b-c6b9-2e22-3fbb1bbc9394@metricspace.net>
References:  <dc08792a-3215-611c-eb9f-4936a0d621f9@metricspace.net> <CAG5KPzws=jmF2wLeEAz8Lzn7Ugude=0w5neoQjeDjYnGtJpS9Q@mail.gmail.com> <13959.1509132270@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAG5KPzxGtAwV-svCv24FbZtLvxKCwX7OSyb2pPaTc63EUmFFGA@mail.gmail.com> <20171028022557.GE96685@kduck.kaduk.org> <23376.1509177812@critter.freebsd.dk> <20171028123132.GF96685@kduck.kaduk.org> <24228.1509196559@critter.freebsd.dk> <df46aaa5-13a9-2fc6-bcd2-d57d792800eb@metricspace.net> <e83f9add-d6d4-494d-669a-215765c0b5eb@elischer.org> <cfa28da2-0a4b-c6b9-2e22-3fbb1bbc9394@metricspace.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 31 October 2017 at 11:48, Eric McCorkle <eric@metricspace.net> wrote:
> On 10/30/2017 04:05, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> On 29/10/17 8:36 am, Eric McCorkle wrote:
>>> On 10/28/2017 09:15, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>>> --------
>>>> In message <20171028123132.GF96685@kduck.kaduk.org>, Benjamin Kaduk
>>>> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> I would say that the 1.1.x series is less bad, especially on the
>>>>> last count,
>>>>> but don't know how much you've looked at the differences in the new
>>>>> branch.
>>>> While "less bad" is certainly a laudable goal for OpenSSL, I hope
>>>> FreeBSD has higher ambitions.
>>>>
>>> I'm curious about your thoughts on LibreSSL as a possible option.
>>
>> what gives any evidence as to it being any better?
>
> At least as about its first year and a half, LibreSSL had a markedly
> better track record than OpenSSL (zero high-severity CVEs vs 5 from
> OpenSSL, about half as many mid- and low-security CVEs).

Not getting CVEs doesn't mean not having the issues:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-announce&m=140752800525709.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG5KPzzkSz93dO9F0vuKtvVQdZgfTTsnh1dzX4iqCkEHmxXjTQ>