Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 00:36:37 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net> To: "Maxim Khitrov" <mkhitrov@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virtualization of FreeBSD Message-ID: <20070608003637.4595b961@localhost> In-Reply-To: <26ddd1750706061818m4eb25c5ama1c1a91243d7754c@mail.gmail.com> References: <46674717.6020105@calarts.edu> <26ddd1750706061711t660afba9h737735b9e1805c65@mail.gmail.com> <91A69DD3-FDFD-4D66-A2DA-642DEA450FD7@techally.com> <26ddd1750706061818m4eb25c5ama1c1a91243d7754c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:18:16 -0400
"Maxim Khitrov" <mkhitrov@gmail.com> wrote:
> You mean the info in general, or the e1000 part? I never had any
> errors in my Windows sys log. However, if you use the default network
> adapter you will have problems. I don't remember what the exact error
> is, but I remember that when downloading the ports tree, for example,
> it will periodically interrupt the transfer. Something about dropped
> packets, or something else like that. Never had problems with e1000,
> but the network only seems to perform at about 1/2 of what the host OS
> can handle.
you mean problems with the lnc0 , as seen by FBSD in the VM? interesting, i've
never had any problems, but I run VMWare server under Centos 4.
I'll give the e1000 a try :) thx for the tip.
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent,
but the one most responsive to change." Charles Darwin.
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070608003637.4595b961>