Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 10:04:28 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> To: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base) Message-ID: <9FC46F8F9925D46A00C61D8F@cc-126-240.int.t-online.fr> In-Reply-To: <20060303082016.GA17730@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <20060302155625.37140.qmail@web32714.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060302160958.GA2035@flame.pc> <20060303082016.GA17730@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+-le 03/03/2006 09:20 +0100, Divacky Roman =E9crivait : | On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 06:09:58PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: |> On 2006-03-02 16:56, pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com wrote: |> > Hi; |> >=20 |> > I'm not wanting to be rude or anything, but is the idea of |> > moving to subversion at some point in time completely dead, or |> > is csup going to interact with it somehow? |>=20 |> ``Moving to Subversion'' is not really with us right now. On the |> other hand, csup and CVS are with us today, and are ready to use. |> I don't see why using or developing csup inhibits a potential |> future move to Subversion, if that's what you are asking. |=20 | I think that Robert Ollivier strongly suggested using mercurial as our | (possibly) next vcs, so if any move from cvs then to mercurial.. There is a http://hg.fr.freebsd.org/ which is kept up-to-date :-) --=20 Mathieu Arnold
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9FC46F8F9925D46A00C61D8F>