Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Feb 1999 17:15:46 GMT
From:      attila! <attila@hun.org>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   maybe "BSD Unix"  (was Re: FreeBSD [3.1] is Unix ??? (Was: Re: 3.1 Release splash image))
Message-ID:  <199902281715.RAA12252@hun.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

    NB> anyone who wants to agree/argue with me, please use
    	private mail; please don't clutter the list further 
    	than I am doing now...

    to cut to the chase:

	BSD Unix

    should sidestep X/Open and to my mind implies the best of
    both worlds; or even

	freeBSD, [the true-blue] descendant of Berkeley Unix

    which is certainly justifiable having been down the road
    since bsd4.0...

    personally, I object to "unix like" which leaves open the
    question:

	'...unix like? why dont you use real unix?'

    personally, after 25+ years of un*x, I have never seen two
    identical versions of "Unix" (or even closely related), even
    on identical hardware.  why should one of very few lineal
    descendants of Unix be forced into the non-compatibles camp?

    the only point of convergence and standardization of the
    AT&T and Berkeley worlds was when Sun, under contract to
    AT&T's Unix International subsidiary merged AT&T SysV R4 to
    SunOS and more or less buried the problem of sockets
    v. named pipes --and then AT&T sold Unix International to
    Novell so old Ray could try to make IPX be the wrapper for
    IP... Ray crashed and burned against the wall on that one,
    subsequently transferring title to "Unix" to X/Open.

    once burned, twice learned Ray is currently the money behind
    Caldera and possibly on his way to winning an anti-trust
    action against M$ for M$' shabby treatment of anyone trying
    to load Windoz on DR-DOS.

    in the mid-80s, when every Tom, Dick, and Harry had a un*x
    hardware box (over 100 at one point), the hardware vendors
    could not even maintain backwards compatibility in their own
    point releases, which was the major factor in driving ISPs
    away from un*x in droves and handing the market to Bill
    Gate$ by default (may the bloated pig impload).


	    attila out...

 __________________________________________________________________________
 go not unto usenet for advice, for the inhabitants thereof will say:
 yes, and no, and maybe, and I don't know, and fuck-off.
 _________________________________________________________________ attila__

 To be a ruler of men, you need at least 12 inches....
 There is no safety this side of the grave.  Never was; never will be.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902281715.RAA12252>