Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Jun 2003 06:08:06 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        tracking@freebsd.mheller.org
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Interview in Byte with Chris Sontag/SCO and FUD relating to BSDsettlement agreement
Message-ID:  <20030617.060806.42773474.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <3EEF00E4.9000908@freebsd.mheller.org>
References:  <3EEF00E4.9000908@freebsd.mheller.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <3EEF00E4.9000908@freebsd.mheller.org>
            Martin Heller <tracking@freebsd.mheller.org> writes:
: Will the FreeBSD project issue an offical statement relating to these
: allegations?
: What will happen to FreeBSD if SCO aims at the BSD projects. Could SCO 
: revoke the Settlement Agreement and pursue a court ruling?

This is not an official statement from the project.

There is not now, nor has there *EVER* been *ANY* System V code in
BSD.  *EVER*.  NEVER.  NEVER.  NEVER.  The IP connected with the BSD
suit of the early 1990s derived from pre System V and System III
versions of Unix.  In fact, Version 7 unix has more Berkeley
copyrights in it than AT&T copyright notices.

The settlement terms specifically state that SCO cannot sue anybody
who makes a release based on 4.4-LITE.  The settlement agreement is
BINDING on both parties.  SCO cannot revoke it, and will have a hell
of a legal fight if they try.

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030617.060806.42773474.imp>