Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 20:43:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Sung Nae Cho <sucho2@quasar.phys.vt.edu> To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Softupdate, is it better than journaling file system? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107232038230.17179-100000@quasar.phys.vt.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I was wondering if there is a real perferomance comparison between softupdates and journaling file systems available for Linux systems. One thing I still don't like about FreeBSD is the file (copying, deleting, extracting... etc) system performance. Linux seems to be much faster in (copying, deleting, extracting.....) files than FreeBSD even with "async" option enabled in fstab. How good is softupdates compared to those already maturing journaling file systems available to Linux? Regards, Sung N. Cho, Monday, July 23, 2001. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.33.0107232038230.17179-100000>