Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:23:11 +0100 From: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Paul Murphy <pnmurphy@cogeco.ca>, Heinrich Rebehn <rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No xvideo support for ATI Rage Pro? Message-ID: <3E7A070F.8030405@liwing.de> References: <3E797D1F.8070807@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20030320123818.GA15027@rot13.obsecurity.org> <3E79B877.70106@liwing.de> <200303201423.27103.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Thursday 20 March 2003 13:47, Jens Rehsack wrote: > >>Kris Kennaway wrote: >> >>>Isn't the Rago Pro a different card than the Rage 128 Pro? >> >>Sometimes, sometimes not ... > > > Definitely different, and not just sometimes. :) The RagePro chipset is much > older than the Rage 128 Pro. > Sorry, the site at ati.com is gone where the several chips are described, but in past sometimes I had to identify the cards by chip and a number on it. There are some Rage PRO and Rage 128 Pro which were the same and there were differences between several Rage PRO's and Rage 128 PRO's and Rage 3D PRO's. It was very difficult to see, because it depends on the time they were built. The first Rage PRO and the first Rage 128 PRO are different, yes, but some of them had the same features ... I don't want to tell they are indentical, they aren't. Neither all Rage PRO based cards are. Sorry that I cannot point you the page ... Jens To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E7A070F.8030405>