Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:30:06 +0100 From: Albert Shih <Albert.Shih@obspm.fr> To: Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg or ports. Message-ID: <20140218183006.GA96258@pcjas.obspm.fr> In-Reply-To: <20140218190759.44d565ee@baby-jane.lamaiziere.net> References: <20140218170142.GA78433@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20140218190759.44d565ee@baby-jane.lamaiziere.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 18/02/2014 à 19:07:59+0100, Patrick Lamaiziere a écrit
> Le Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:01:42 +0100,
> Albert Shih <Albert.Shih@obspm.fr> a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> > I'm little lost since FreeBSD introduce pkgng.
> >
> > Should I use pkgng or the ports (like I did before ?)
>
> This is two differents things, ports build packages and pkg manages the
> packages. You can use both.
>
> > My server is manage through puppet, so I would like to use pkg for
> > some « basic » packages (like bash, vim etc..) but want ports system
> > for important thing (like postgresql-server) because I can tune the
> > option.
>
> I suggest to use poudriere to build your own packages (using your
> options). Then it is very easy to upgrade a full machine with pkg
> upgrade -f
Ok.
> And you are sur that the packages set is consistant.
>
> > But in that way how I manage to maintaint up2date ALL packages ?
>
> poudriere and pkg :-)
Ok.
One more question (probably stupid...):
My server use jail, can I use the host to build and use it on all jail
? or should I use a jail for poudriere ?
Thanks for the help
Regards.
JAS
--
Albert SHIH
DIO bâtiment 15
Observatoire de Paris
5 Place Jules Janssen
92195 Meudon Cedex
France
Téléphone : +33 1 45 07 76 26/+33 6 86 69 95 71
xmpp: jas@obspm.fr
Heure local/Local time:
mar 18 fév 2014 19:28:45 CET
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140218183006.GA96258>