Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 May 1998 11:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Billy Thompson <billy@idiom.com>
To:        Frank Pawlak <fpawlak@execpc.com>
Cc:        freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD A Solution For Business
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980522110313.622A-100000@idiom.com>
In-Reply-To: <980522043451.ZM3627@darkstar.connect.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

I think what is absolutely necessary to this would be a graph comparison
between Win NT and FreeBSD.  Start with a lite load then keep pushing it
up until both systems are crawling.  This would demostrate not only how
reliable FreeBSD is on the SAME hardware, but also how much better it is
(since I'm sure there will be obviously better performance from FreeBSD).

Then plaster this on as many websites as you can and include it in the
business solutions document.  You know how much pointy haired bosses love
graphs and charts, and this should show them in simple terms that FreeBSD
has better preformance and is more reliable.

-billy



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980522110313.622A-100000>