Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:11:04 -0500
From:      David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r187475 - head/usr.bin/make
Message-ID:  <20090120191104.GA32825@zim.MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <200901201715.n0KHFCfw051198@svn.freebsd.org>
References:  <200901201715.n0KHFCfw051198@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009, Roman Divacky wrote:
>   Remove inlining of functions that are used mostly in different object files.
>   This gets rid of gnu89 style inlining.

While I think fixing uses of 'inline' in the tree is a great goal,
un-inlining accessor functions that compile down to a single
machine instruction anyway may not be the best way to approach it.
In cases like this, you can just use '__gnu89_inline', or even
'static inline' without causing any bloat. (In this particular
case, I doubt that it really matters one way or the other.)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090120191104.GA32825>