Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 23:02:36 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: Aaron Holmes <evil@evildomain.org>, chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam filters Message-ID: <86mzlqiaab.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20051003232829.56d753ea@it.buh.tecnik93.com> (Ion-Mihai Tetcu's message of "Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:28:29 %2B0300") References: <43410329.2080902@evildomain.org> <20051003232829.56d753ea@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> writes: > Aaron Holmes <evil@evildomain.org> wrote: > > Any recomendations on good spam filters? > Dspam [is] more accurate that spam assassin,with less resources and > less work for the admin Dspam is designed to work as a local delivery agent; all email addresses must map to a local user, and it delivers mail to an mbox file (though there are patches to make it work with maildir). For more complex setups (IMAP server, virtual mailboxes / domains), SpamAssassin is still the only practical alternative. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86mzlqiaab.fsf>