Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:47:38 +0900
From:      Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FS size
Message-ID:  <39973C85-31FD-46A5-A466-E5B69B14C9E7@u.washington.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20060916083301.GA15083@math.jussieu.fr>
References:  <20060916083301.GA15083@math.jussieu.fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 16, 2006, at 5:33 PM, Albert Shih wrote:

> Hi all
>
> I've read
>
> 	http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/index.html
>
> and I want know actually on i386 arch is the limit of a fs is =20
> already 2 Tb
> What's the situation on amd64/EMT64, can we have big fs ? something =20=

> like 10
> or more TB ?
>
> Regards.
> --
> Albert SHIH
> Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT)
> U.F.R. de Mathematiques.
> 7 i=E8me =E9tage, plateau D, bureau 10
> Heure local/Local time:
> Sat Sep 16 10:30:05 CEST 2006

Think 4TB for 64-bit, if the limitations are truly integer based. 32 =20
bit -> 64 bit usually just increases the precision usable by 2 unless =20=

someone builds in increased number support.
-Garrett=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39973C85-31FD-46A5-A466-E5B69B14C9E7>