Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:22:25 +0200 From: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= <marko.cupac@mimar.rs> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recommended poudriere jail versions? Message-ID: <20151002132225.5b888ebf@efreet.kappastar.com> In-Reply-To: <e2532564e560b15b4b725e29d441da1e@mailbox.ijs.si> References: <20151001103206.2d2603a4@efreet.kappastar.com> <e2532564e560b15b4b725e29d441da1e@mailbox.ijs.si>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:05:32 +0200 Mark Martinec <Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si> wrote: > 2015-10-01 10:32, Marko Cupa=C4=87 wrote: > > what is the recommended poudriere jail version for building ports? > > So far I was trying to be on latest binary patchlevel for every > > minor version for both base system, poudriere jails and clients, > > but I ended up with three jails just for amd64 (9.3, 10.1 and > > 10.2), where I need to > > rebuild all the ports every time I patch poudriere jails. This is > > starting to take too much of my time. > >=20 > > I see that pkg.freebsd.org hosts just one set of ports per > > architecture of major version. What is the OS version they are built > > on? Are there any downsides in building all the ports for > > 10.2-<latestpathclevel> on 10.1-<nopatches>? >=20 > I used to have poudriere jails based on a minor version like you have, > but ended up in a simplified setup, building ports only on > 10.0-RELEASE and installing them on 10.1 or 10.2 and 10-STABLE. I > think the official packages are also built based on 10.0-RELEASE . >=20 > This mostly works, except for a port like virtualbox-ose-kmod, > which causes a kernel crash when built on 10.0-RELEASE and run > on 10.2. So after each ports upgrade when noticing that pkg > is reinstalling virtualbox-ose-kmod, I re-build this one from > ports on a target host, otherwise the next reboot will end up > crashing on loading a vboxdrv kernel module during startup. Thanx for info. I'd like to give building everything on 10.1-RELEASE-<nopatches> a try, but I don't see the ability of poudriere to specify patclevel when using ftp method - it always fetches the latest one. Is this by design, to discourage building on potentially vulnerable versions, or just non-implemented functionality? Regards, --=20 Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. After enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. Marko Cupa=C4=87 https://www.mimar.rs/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151002132225.5b888ebf>