Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:13:04 +0200 From: Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? Message-ID: <162c9c97-db6c-73fe-b503-5373122f08a2@rail.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20190625082715.lt27gdyimo3etpjz@deathbolt.927589452.space> References: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> <CANJ8om6WmNQWibnSCMR2hf09he-wWBUnBmY5Mnn7%2BNtvUHhcBQ@mail.gmail.com> <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com> <20190625071943.vwswhj2lh6ctj4vy@deathbolt.927589452.space> <20190625083824.2c259fbd7ef91efcc3857e77@sohara.org> <20190625082715.lt27gdyimo3etpjz@deathbolt.927589452.space>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 25/06/2019 à 10:27, mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de a écrit : > On 19-06-25 08:38:24, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:19:43 +0200 >> mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de wrote: >> >>> The hardest thing is getting a real IPv&/ bigger than a /64 as this is >>> required by most systems. >> >> For lab work a /48 over a HE tunnel should do fine, only the router >> knows it's a tunnel :) > TBH: I just went live with it in my (home) network and gladly my > provider announced a /48 per user > _______________________________________________ My home provider provides a /56. But the box it provides as home gateway, without which there is no support and which is very difficult to replace by a real router is unable to handle more than a /64 on the LAN side...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?162c9c97-db6c-73fe-b503-5373122f08a2>