Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 14:27:22 -0500 From: Drew Baxter <netmonger@genesis.ispace.com> To: "Jason C. Wells" <jcwells@u.washington.edu>, Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Let's nail some things down. Message-ID: <4.1.19981028142657.00a66940@genesis.ispace.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9810281108590.782-100000@s8-37-26.student.wa shington.edu> References: <36375E2B.7FB07828@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:15 AM 10/28/98 -0800, Jason C. Wells wrote: >We will have two logos. "Works with" and "Designed for". Do we agree? > >The test for "Works with" should be a simple "can it run under some sort >of emulation?" (E.G acroread) > >The test for "Designed for" should be "can we build it from source?" or >"did the developer build FreeBSD native binaries?". (E.G. netscape and >all source available ports) > >Do the above statements seem reasonable? If so, let's set them in stone so >we can reduce the number of degrees of freedom in this problem and work >toward a solution. > >I think Wes' concerns about "giant infrastructure" are valid. I think the >KISS principle should apply. Do we agree? > >Catchya Later, | UW Mechanical Engineering >Jason Wells | http://weber.u.washington.edu/~jcwells/ Sounds good to me. --- Drew "Droobie" Baxter Network Admin/Professional Computer Nerd(TM) OneEX: The OneNetwork Exchange 207-942-0275 http://www.droo.orland.me.us My Latest Kernel: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT (ONEEX) #14: Mon Oct 19 22:36:58 EDT 1998 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.1.19981028142657.00a66940>