Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:32:05 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 224247] [patch] RFC 6980 requires to drop fragmented IPv6 neighbour discovery
Message-ID:  <bug-224247-2472-Z1hA1CHag3@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-224247-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-224247-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224247

Andrey V. Elsukov <ae@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ae@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #5 from Andrey V. Elsukov <ae@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to lutz from comment #4)
> Thank your for the pointer to functionality duplication in other modules.
>=20
> I moved the flag-setting to the fragment header removal code (which is mo=
re
> appropriate anyway). This code is more likely to be shared by other modul=
es
> (in the case of pf, it is used).
>=20
> Furthermore the flag is renamed to be more self explanatory and the code =
was
> brushed up to match the existing coding style.
>=20
> Did I miss anything else?

This looks good to me.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-224247-2472-Z1hA1CHag3>