Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 21:42:45 -0500 (EST) From: Bernie Doehner <bad@uhf.wireless.net> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@hotjobs.com> Cc: smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2.8R Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901222140130.520-100000@uhf.wireless.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901222024170.55154-100000@bright.fx.genx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 20:26:00 -0500 (EST) > From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@hotjobs.com> > To: Bernie Doehner <bad@wireless.net> > Cc: smp@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: 2.2.8R > You're wrong, 3.0 has supported SMP for quite a bit of time before > 3.0-RELEASE, however afaik, 2.2.anything NEVER had SMP. Argghh.. You got me there! This is an ISP environment, so things have to be a little stable, and I automaticaly jump to the -RELEASE (by default).. However, my managers don't think 3.0-R is stable, so 2.2.anything is the "requirement". Bernie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9901222140130.520-100000>