Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:41:54 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org, doceng@FreeBSD.org, Gavin Atkinson <gavin@FreeBSD.org>, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>, Ulrich =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sp=F6rlein?= <uqs@FreeBSD.org>, Rene Ladan <rene@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Conversion to SVN Message-ID: <20111009164154.GA3819@emphyrio.blackend.org> In-Reply-To: <4E91CDB1.3070304@FreeBSD.org> References: <20111007141312.GJ26743@acme.spoerlein.net> <4E8F0AA2.3020704@freebsd.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1110072203320.17415@ury.york.ac.uk> <4E8F8873.4030006@FreeBSD.org> <20111008090351.GA1960@emphyrio.blackend.org> <4E91A867.9060905@FreeBSD.org> <20111009153343.GC2006@emphyrio.blackend.org> <4E91CDB1.3070304@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 09:37:05AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 10/09/2011 08:33, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:57:59PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > >> On 2011.10.08. 11:03, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > >>> And before doing the change, some things should > >>> be done: complete separation between release docs and doc/ > >> Or maybe complete integration? Once we are in SVN we can branch release > >> docs even if we do not branch the rest to make it easy for translators. > >> What do you think? > >> > > > > It's obvious that your point of view can also be defended, but the aim > > from src point of view is to be able to build a release without the need > > of a doc tree. > > If there isn't already a knob to avoid building the docs in the new > release building system (like there was in the old one) then there > certainly should be. > By "release" I meant "release bits + its release docs". > Meanwhile, one of the virtues of having doc and src in the same svn repo > is the ability to have one canonical version of the documentation. > -- Marc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111009164154.GA3819>