Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:51:43 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: markm@freebsd.org, audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Solicitation for auditing process announcement Message-ID: <20001210125143.C84921@bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1001130234448.97425E-100000@fledge.watson.org>; from rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 11:46:08PM -0500 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011302018430.59011-100000@beppo.feral.com> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1001130234448.97425E-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 11:46:08PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > >indicating that audit@ is willing to do review-on-demand and should be > > > > What does 'review on demand' mean? > > It means that we're too laid back to have figured out rigorous, pro-active > re-auditing of the source tree, and instead we sit there and wait until > someone e-mails audit@ saying, ``I'm going to make the following stupid > changes to the following setuid binaries, could you take a look and OK > them before I drive-by commit them twenty minutes before the release?'' Mark Murray was talking about the possiblity of having an audit database to allow us to check what's been audited down to a granularity of a line of source code. How useful is this? Joe -- Josef Karthauser [joe@FreeBSD.org, joe@tao.org.uk] ......... FreeBSD: The power to change the world ........ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001210125143.C84921>