Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Jan 1999 13:32:14 +1030
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Mark Ovens <marko@uk.radan.com>
Cc:        "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>, Sheldon Hearn <axl@iafrica.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net>, FreeBSD Chat <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: English style (was: btokup().. patch to STYLE(9) (fwd))
Message-ID:  <19990130133214.J8473@freebie.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <36B27388.E1E1D99A@uk.radan.com>; from Mark Ovens on Sat, Jan 30, 1999 at 02:50:48AM %2B0000
References:  <90073.917600532@axl.noc.iafrica.com> <36B1CABD.BCC90EC7@newsguy.com> <19990130101911.V8473@freebie.lemis.com> <36B27388.E1E1D99A@uk.radan.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, 30 January 1999 at  2:50:48 +0000, Mark Ovens wrote:
>
>
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>>
>> [moved to chat]
>>
>> On Friday, 29 January 1999 at 23:50:37 +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
>>> Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I didn't have a problem reading the sentence, even though you left out
>>>> required commas. The only thing that caused a problem was your use of
>>>> split infinitive. ;-)
>>>
>>> Split infinitive is a urban legend. It has *never* been outlawed in
>>> the english language, except for some crazy people in this century
>>> and, I think, later last century.
>>
>
> Not according to the OED. It is only in the most recent edition that the
> split infinitive is officially recognized as grammatically correct.
>
> The classic example is Star Trek; "To boldly go.....", until now it
> should have been "Boldly to go...", or "To go boldly....".
>
> Still, what the hell. We all speak American nowadays anyway ;-)

>From an authority that the Americans are more likely to accept, I
quote the Chicago Manual of Style, 14th Edition, section 2.98
(footnote):

  The thirteenth edition of this manual included split infinitives
  among the examples of ``errors and infelicities'' but tempered the
  inclusion by adding, in parentheses, that they are ``debatable
  `error' ''.  The term has been dropped from the fourteenth edition
  because the Press now regards the intelligent and discriminating use
  of the construction as a legitimate form of expression and nothing
  writers or editors need feel uneasy about.  Indeed, it seems to us
  that in many cases clarity ad naturalness of expression are best
  served by a judicious splitting of infinitives.

Greg
--
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990130133214.J8473>