Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:56:55 -0400
From:      "D G Teed" <donald.teed@gmail.com>
To:        "AT Matik" <asstec@matik.com.br>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: how to go about diagnosing cause of packet loss
Message-ID:  <dd4da0390611280856h3177ef24yc76e4352dba65253@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200611271806.50641.asstec@matik.com.br>
References:  <dd4da0390611271156g1f0ee1f5yea9c35f65664053d@mail.gmail.com> <200611271806.50641.asstec@matik.com.br>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Hi,

OK, I think you've helped us prove that ipfw isn't the issue.
The packet loss remained with rule 01 of allow ip from any
to any.  We'll need to measure our bandwidth
processed on the box.  Thanks for the help.

--Donald Teed

On 11/27/06, AT Matik <asstec@matik.com.br> wrote:
>
> On Monday 27 November 2006 16:56, D G Teed wrote:
> > We suspect something in FreeBSD or ipfw has a flaw,
> > but cannot find it.
>
> how are the results when your server has its FW open?
>
> Jo=E3o
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada
> segura.
> Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dd4da0390611280856h3177ef24yc76e4352dba65253>