Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:56:55 -0400 From: "D G Teed" <donald.teed@gmail.com> To: "AT Matik" <asstec@matik.com.br> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to go about diagnosing cause of packet loss Message-ID: <dd4da0390611280856h3177ef24yc76e4352dba65253@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200611271806.50641.asstec@matik.com.br> References: <dd4da0390611271156g1f0ee1f5yea9c35f65664053d@mail.gmail.com> <200611271806.50641.asstec@matik.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, OK, I think you've helped us prove that ipfw isn't the issue. The packet loss remained with rule 01 of allow ip from any to any. We'll need to measure our bandwidth processed on the box. Thanks for the help. --Donald Teed On 11/27/06, AT Matik <asstec@matik.com.br> wrote: > > On Monday 27 November 2006 16:56, D G Teed wrote: > > We suspect something in FreeBSD or ipfw has a flaw, > > but cannot find it. > > how are the results when your server has its FW open? > > Jo=E3o > > > > > > > > A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada > segura. > Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dd4da0390611280856h3177ef24yc76e4352dba65253>